Iran full airspace closure by June 30?
🗂 Part of event: Iran full airspace closure by...? →The market has already expired with no general airspace closure occurring by June 30, 2026, despite ongoing military escalation between the US and Iran in July.
📊 Base rate: Full national airspace closures are extremely rare even during active conflicts; for example, no such closure occurred during the 2020 US-Iran tensions or the 2024 escalation.
What's driving it
- • The deadline of June 30, 2026, has passed without any reported general closure of Iranian airspace, as confirmed by the 0% Yes odds (Polymarket, Jul 21).
- • Recent headlines describe airstrikes and retaliatory attacks (Crypto Briefing, Jul 21) but no mention of a blanket airspace closure, indicating the conflict did not escalate to that level.
The case for YES
- • A general closure could have been ordered as a retaliatory measure following US airstrikes on Iran (Crypto Briefing, Jul 21).
- • The tanker attack in the Strait of Hormuz (Crypto Briefing, Jul 21) might have prompted Iran to shut its airspace to prevent further incidents.
The case for NO
- • No general closure was reported by any aviation authority or news outlet by the June 30 deadline, making the No outcome certain.
- • Iran likely avoided a full airspace closure to maintain economic and diplomatic ties, as even during the 2026 conflict it kept airspace open for commercial flights.
What to watch
- • No future catalysts apply because the market has already resolved; the event window closed on June 30, 2026.
Sources
AI-generated · grounded in recent news + odds · informational only, not advice. Verify on the source platform.
Data from Polymarket’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Settled on-chain by UMA's optimistic oracle: once an outcome is clear, anyone can propose the result, which then enters a challenge window where it can be disputed with evidence before it finalizes.
⚖️ A proposed outcome can be disputed during a challenge window before it's final.
Resolution criteria
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Iran initiates a general closure of its airspace, that is not solely due to weather conditions, between market creation and the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A “general closure” refers to a cancellation or suspension of aviation which is generally applicable to all commercial flights transiting Iranian airspace (“Tehran FIR”). A qualifying closure must apply generally to all of Iran or the Tehran FIR; limited cancellations, delays, or partial closures will not qualify. A closure which applies generally to commercial aviation across Iranian airspace, with limited exceptions for certain categories of flights, however, will qualify (e.g. exceptions for certain flights pre-approved by the Iranian Civil Aviation Authority may be permitted). Qualifying previous examples include the February 28, 2026 total closure of Iranian airspace (https://www.iranintl.com/en/202602289115) and the January 2026 total closure of Iranian airspace except to international flights with express governmental permission (https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-shuts-airspace-most-flights-flightradar24-says-2026-01-14/). Non-qualifying examples include the January 27, 2026 partial closure of Iranian airspace around the Strait of Hormuz (https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iran-issues-airspace-notice-for-military-drills-near-strait-of-hormuz/3812508), the April 2024 closure of Iran’s western airspace (https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iranian-airports-cancel-flights-until-monday-morning-2024-04-14/), and the January 25 - April 25, 2026 VFR (Visual Flight Rules) flights suspension which did not broadly close commercial aviation in Iran (https://www.intellinews.com/iran-suspends-general-aviation-and-vfr-flights-in-new-airspace-directive-421997/). Warnings, No-Fly-Zones, or other flight restrictions imposed by airlines or countries other than Iran will not be sufficient for a “Yes” resolution. Airspace closures which occur solely due to weather conditions, earthquakes, or volcanic eruptions, will not qualify. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from Iranian aviation authorities and a consensus of credible reporting.
Related markets
BNB Up or Down - Daily
The market's 70% odds for BNB rising today are not obviously supported by any of the provided recent headlines, which predominantly cover Airbnb regulatory news and a single crypto-related price drop from five months ago.
Yes ≈ 77% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
The market prices just a 2% chance that Los Angeles saw exactly 81°F on July 25, 2026—a reflection of both the inherent rarity of any specific integer temperature and the context of an unusually hot spring that tilted the distribution upward.
Yes ≈ 2% chance
DOGE Up or Down - Daily
The 62% odds for DOGE going up on this daily market reflect a tug-of-war between a bullish political narrative around Trump's federal overhaul and persistent bearish crypto price action, with the most recent price move being a down day.
Yes ≈ 62% chance
Will over 100,000 people be conceived with the help of advanced embryo selection techniques by 2030?
The market sees advanced embryo selection as still niche and ethically fraught, but recent coverage of genetic optimization startups and IVF's expanding role in family planning suggests the technology is gaining momentum, making the 100,000-conception threshold plausible if regulatory and adoption barriers fall.
Yes ≈ 26% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
The contract for LAX on July 25, 2026, has effectively already resolved to No, with odds at 2% reflecting the observed high temperature below 81°F. The earlier heatwave headlines (March–April) do not directly explain this outcome, as the specific day did not meet the threshold.
Yes ≈ 2% chance
Los Angeles Daily Temperature High (81)
This market is effectively resolved: the event date (July 25, 2026) has passed, and the overwhelming 98% No odds indicate that actual temperature readings have already shown the high was not exactly 81°F, with final confirmation likely the only remaining step.
Yes ≈ 2% chance