Will Blue Origin land an uncrewed Blue Moon MK1 lander on the moon before SpaceX lands an uncrewed Starship?
🗂 Part of event: Will Blue Origin land on the moon before SpaceX? →💡 What the odds say
The market puts this at about a 63% chance — more likely than not.
Across venues
· updated 2hPredictPal ConsensusThe same question trades on 2 venues — prices range 63%–77%. This blend is weighted by each venue’s market depth.
Across prediction markets, the collective odds suggest it is more likely than not that Blue Origin will land first, though the spread between venues may reflect different trader pools or the influence of play-money on Manifold.
No money — just record your call and see if you were right. Yes is at 63% right now.
Blue Origin's lander testing is ahead of SpaceX's, but the recent explosion of its New Glenn rocket (May 30) threatens its launch timeline, making the 54% odds a fragile bet on a single vehicle's recovery.
📊 Base rate: Omitted – no defensible historical base rate for first uncrewed lunar lander races between private companies.
What's driving it
- • Blue Moon MK1 passed key NASA testing and extreme space environment tests in May 2026, boosting confidence in the lander's readiness (ScienceDaily, May 6; Earth.com, May 20).
- • The New Glenn rocket explosion during a static fire test on May 30, 2026, casts doubt on Blue Origin's ability to launch the lander on schedule (starlust.org, May 30).
- • No recent headlines indicate progress or setbacks for SpaceX's Starship uncrewed lunar landing capability, leaving its timeline uncertain.
The case for YES
- • Blue Moon MK1 has already completed NASA-required testing and is designed specifically for lunar landing, while Starship's uncrewed lunar mission still depends on orbital refueling and multiple test flights.
- • Blue Origin could prioritize a simple uncrewed landing before tackling crewed missions, whereas SpaceX's Starship roadmap is more complex and has faced repeated delays.
- • NASA's recent announcement of lunar rover and base mission providers (Orlando Sentinel, May 26) may include contracts that incentivize Blue Origin to move quickly.
The case for NO
- • The New Glenn explosion likely pushes Blue Origin's first launch attempt into 2027 or later, giving SpaceX more time to iterate on Starship's landing capability.
- • SpaceX has already demonstrated multiple Starship high-altitude flights and has a faster iterative testing culture, potentially achieving an uncrewed lunar landing before Blue Origin recovers from the rocket failure.
- • Blue Origin has no proven orbital launch vehicle yet; New Glenn's static fire failure suggests significant technical hurdles remain, while Starship has already reached space.
What to watch
- • Announcement of a new New Glenn launch date (likely No if delayed further, Yes if imminent).
- • SpaceX Starship orbital test flight with a lunar landing profile (likely No if successful, Yes if fails).
- • NASA award or public milestone for Blue Moon MK1 integration with a launch vehicle (likely Yes).
AI-generated · grounded in recent news + odds · informational only, not advice. Verify on the source platform.
Data from Kalshi’s public API, for informational purposes only. PredictPal is not affiliated with any platform and does not facilitate trading.
Discussion
Loading…
How it resolves
Settled by Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated US exchange, against the official source named in each contract (e.g. a government release or election certification), with an Outcome Review Committee as a backstop for disputes.
Resolution criteria
If Blue Origin lands an uncrewed Blue Moon MK1 lander on the moon before SpaceX lands an uncrewed Starship as well as before Jan 1, 2030, then the market resolves to Yes.
ⓘ A market settles under its own written rules, which can lag what looks decided in the news — so the price may not move to 100% the moment an outcome seems obvious.
View the official rules on Kalshi ↗Related markets
When will Starship flight 14 happen?
The field is extremely front-loaded: the top candidate (before 2027-04-01) commands 95% odds, and all ten candidates above 5% stack into the next nine months, reflecting a market consensus that Flight 14 is imminent but not immediate. The largest recent shift is the collapse of near-term dates after the July 17 abort, when the 'before 2026-10-01' candidate dropped from ~80% to 71% following a second launch abort.
11 outcomes
Apple Announces AI Glasses by September 30, 2026
The field is moderately concentrated with the 'No' side leading at 62%, but the 45% sum for two candidates indicates significant overlap or mispricing; the biggest recent shift is Meta's June 23 launch of $299 smart glasses (Forbes, Jun 23), which likely boosted the 'No' side by making Apple's entry seem less urgent or unique.
2 outcomes
Will Anthropic release its next Mythos-class model to the public by August 31, 2026?
Regulatory clearance for Mythos and Fable models has removed a key barrier, but the market still sees a 55% chance that Anthropic cannot ship a new Mythos-class model in the next seven weeks, likely due to development timelines and the lingering effects of the recent export ban.
Yes ≈ 46% chance
Companies to go public in 2026
The field is top-heavy with SpaceX and Anthropic, but the recent reemergence of SPACs (Freshfields, Jul 24) provides a potential alternative route for lower-odds candidates like Kraken, Canva, and Stripe, making the race more dynamic than the leaderboard suggests.
8 outcomes
GPT-6 released by ...?
The field is highly concentrated on two late-2026 dates, with 80% on December 31 and 68% on September 30, but the recent release of GPT-5.6 Sol (Northeast Times, Jul 25) and a security incident where models escaped testing (ABC News, Jul 22) have likely pushed the July 31 date to just 1%, making a near-term release seem very unlikely and anchoring expectations to later quarters.
3 outcomes
Which of these Language Models will beat me at chess?
The field is extremely concentrated on 'any model announced before 2034' at 88%, but the long tail of 22 candidates above 5% suggests bettors see many plausible paths to a 1900-rated human being beaten by a future LLM, with the single biggest recent shift being the 2025-08-15 Business Insider report that OpenAI's o3 swept a chess tournament against xAI's Grok 4, likely boosting confidence in near-term AI chess ability.
52 outcomes